Beta tester on SimpleMachine

Started by portamx, 2010 May 06, 11:03:40 pm

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

portamx

*
2010 May 06, 11:03:40 pm
The PortaMx corp. get known, that Feline was appointed as a beta tester for Simplemachine.

Regards,
P.
The best comes last

rd2005

*
#1
2010 May 07, 12:14:09 am
Congratulations Fel on your appointment..

Hope you can help move SMF forward with the style you have with PortaMx

O0

antechinus

*
#2
2010 May 07, 12:22:34 am
Congrats. :)
Using Internet Explorer 6 on the internet is like urinating in a public swimming pool.
It's rude, there's no excuse for it, and anyone who does it should be ashamed of themselves.

Feline

*
#3
2010 May 07, 10:18:50 am
Thanks  :)
I think that helps SMF and us to get a perfect cooperation ..

Fel
Many are stubborn in relation to the way, but less in relation to the target.

codebirth

*
#4
2010 May 15, 01:46:03 am
Good news. Congratulations!  O0

c o d e b i r t h
http://codebirth.com/smf

Powerbob

*
#5
2010 May 29, 11:26:33 am
Toll, Super :D
*
My test Site;http://pplb.net/smf21/index.php
It's nice to be nice :)

hartiberlin

*
#6
2010 June 03, 05:11:08 pm
Good news,
but what happened with the programmers,
who wanted to created this new Phoenix project ?

http://www.yourasoft.org/forum/index.php?topic=1603.0

Did they all leave ?
So no more motivation ?

Norv

*
#7
2010 November 09, 03:26:51 pm
Quote from: hartiberlin, 2010 June 03, 05:11:08 pm
Good news,
but what happened with the programmers,
who wanted to created this new Phoenix project ?

http://www.yourasoft.org/forum/index.php?topic=1603.0

Did they all leave ?
So no more motivation ?



Sorry I see this question so late.

Well, anyway it is not easy to answer you, hartiberlin. Some say the most obvious thing that happened is that people were trying too much to solve this time the problems as they saw them in SMF management, that, well, may have delayed a bit too much starting to actually do what they planned, and lose momentum and people. Others say that maybe it's just that it had a lot of development knowledge and energy, but it didn't have development leadership - to channel this energy, stick to it, and make it happen.

I might be wrong though, in any case. While I was around a bit, I wasn't too much, myself, since early enough I had to spend much too much time on SMF and simply had no time left.

Autopilot

*
#8
2010 November 21, 11:38:55 pm
Given your attitude towards other developers I can't say this is a good thing for SMF.

Norv

*
#9
2010 November 22, 01:01:30 am
I understand you might mean there were problems with people who could have helped development, and I tried to assist them in contributing to development. The attempts failed, despite a lot of time I've given myself on some, to make it work.

With all respect, I would appreciate if you consider that jumping to conclusions when you do not have enough information is helping no one. Thank you.

Autopilot

*
#10
2010 November 22, 01:36:40 am
With all due respect Norv, you have no idea how much information I have to base my opinion, however this particular opinion is based on Feline's own comments in her personal attack on a fellow developer and his mod.
Not very professional and has lead to many PMX followers to switch portals.
I have personal information also that many on the team do not like her.

Norv

*
#11
2010 November 22, 01:59:19 am
I'm sorry, Autopilot. I completely misunderstood your comment initially. Please, accept my apologies.

feline can speak for herself, I will not do that.

I can tell that personally I appreciate her work and support for SMF, her programming skills in object orientation (rarely seen in the current SMF community - not unexpectedly), and software architecture ideas.

Autopilot

*
#12
2010 November 22, 03:05:37 am
No problem Norv, I don't think anyone has called into question her programing skills.

Feline

*
#13
2010 November 22, 10:42:46 am
What are we talking here?
Am I responsible for the other modifications have problems with PortaMx? Probably not ..
We have between 0980 and 0990, no changes made to the code, just the templates adapted to RC4. If Aeva does not work with the RC4 and PortaMx 0990, can be wrong even in Aeva, only it will not be considered.

So you can go and try a other Portal, I wish you good look a that you never miss all the enhanced features they the other portals not have..

Fel
Many are stubborn in relation to the way, but less in relation to the target.

* Shouts

Feline
2018 Aug. 21, 08:10:46 pm
Today we update our Forum to the Version 1.45
Feline
2018 Jun. 09, 07:54:13 pm
Today we update our Forum to Version 1.4
This release is full compatible with the EU GDPR
Feline
2018 Mar. 28, 11:56:21 am
Update for PortaMx 1.54 ecl released.
With this updates the Portal works with PHP 7.x and SMF 2.0.15
Feline
2018 Mar. 17, 10:35:03 pm
PortaMx Forum 1.3
released !

*
Feline
2017 Dec. 10, 04:30:54 am
Today we switched to PHP 7.2 and activate Opcode caching.
Fast .. Very fast *
Feline
2017 Mar. 03, 11:54:35 pm
Today we upgrade our old SMF 2.0 Forum to PortaMx Forum *

* Calendar

Su
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31